Posts Tagged ‘background checks’

University of Tennesee Called On To Background Check Resident Assistants

Thursday, March 31st, 2011

This is a parent’s nightmare.  They send their child off to college with the assumption that the school will have measures in place to keep the students safe.  Unfortunately, the University of Tennessee – Chattanooga didn’t have a background check policy for the resident assistants of the dorms. 

Bernard Morris

Enter Bernard “Junior” Morris.  A convicted felon who managed to gain employment as a Resident Assistant.  Morris was arrested on Monday, March 21, 2011 for allegedly placing hidden cameras in the dorm rooms of female residents.

The students instantly became suspicious when they returned from Spring Break to find new “alarm clocks” installed in their rooms.  Not really understanding why this occurred and also knowing that no repairs are done without informing the students beforehand, a few of them went to campus security.

The very next morning, campus security notified the students that the alarm clocks were actually hidden cameras.  Security had reason to believe the cameras were recording and they caught Morris in the act by finding him on the hallway security cameras entering students’ rooms.

In 2006, Morris was convicted of multiple charges, including aggravated burglary and arson (both felonies) as well as harassment and stalking (misdemeanors).  His bond in the most recent case involving the hidden cameras has been revoked due to his prior criminal record.

At least one of the parents of the victims has called on the university to establish a background check policy to ensure reasonable measures are taken to prevent an incident like this from happening again.  Mitzi Ganus, whose daughter was one of the students to find a new “alarm clock” stated, “I know you cannot protect every person…Every single security measure they had in place did nothing to protect my daughter, and he bypassed every single one, and I’m just livid.”

The university has “restricted” Morris’ access to the campus pending his judicial review.

Ms. Ganus plans on pursuing political officials to see if a bill can be passed requiring college campuses to run background checks on people in supervisory positions.

Medical Staffing Agencies Should Review Background Check Policies

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

What if you were sick or injured, but found yourself being tended to by an inept nurse or caregiver? Would you feel comfortable knowing someone with a criminal record or a drug addiction was administering your medication or monitoring your vital signs? How about a family member or friend in that situation?

Disturbingly enough, a recent story in the Los Angeles Times revealed that individuals completely unqualified for positions in the nursing industry are being placed in care centers and hospitals by medical staffing agencies that require little in the way of background screenings and medical certifications. As a result, unqualified people are being signed up to provide care to some of the most vulnerable segments of the population.

A $4 billion dollar industry, agencies that specialize in staffing hospitals with temporary or contracted personnel find themselves engaged in a lucrative venture. Although there are many professional agencies that offer trusted and qualified personnel, others cut corners on background checks or forgo them altogether in the interest of keeping as many people in the field to earn as much money as possible. Often, the individuals who slip by have a variety of criminal charges both in and out of the medical industry.

The executive director of the Arizona State Board of Nursing, Joey Ridenour, agrees that there is a serious issue at hand which needs to be addressed: “I think it’s easier to hide in the registries. Some [firms] just sign them up.”

Firms have been found to have hired out nurses with past breaches of conduct such as ignoring patients, sleeping on the job, dereliction of duty, looting prescription drugs, theft of patient property, calling in illegal prescriptions, providing faulty or inaccurate medical information to doctors, erratic behavior, mental imbalance and more.

The list of off-duty conduct of many of these people is equally terrible. Charges ranging from DUI’s, carrying concealed weapons, assault with a deadly weapon, theft, and even prostitution are among some of the marks on individuals records that were turned up. The list provided by the L.A. Times reads more like the rap sheet of career criminals rather than the orderlies or nurses one would think would be approved to attend to the sick and infirm.

The nursing staffing industry nationwide is composed of an estimated 3,000-6,000 agencies nationwide. Standards run the gamut from publicly traded businesses and companies to individuals doing business out of their homes. There’s no real standardization at all for screening, backgrounds checks or verification of one’s eligibility to be a nursing practitioner. Bad seeds who can’t work anywhere else find easy opportunities to be rehired again and again by leapfrogging from one agency to another.

Nursing supervisor Sandra Thompson who is employed at Northridge Hospital Medical Center and Sherman Oaks in the San Fernando Valley was quoted by the L.A. Times saying “A lot of them are really bad nurses. Sometimes I see them here at Northridge and and think ‘I wonder how long before I see them over at Sherman Oaks?’”

Compounding the issue is that health care institutions that are under budget and time constraints simply can’t double check the temps they are being presented with. Often the word of the agency has to be taken for what it is worth. And as mentioned before, a nationwide nursing shortage means that often a hospital is forced to work with the staff available to them. It’s like buying a used car on the spot without having a qualified mechanic take a look under the hood first.

The health care industry, which is literally vital to the well being of this nation’s population, needs to assert itself and address this problem. Otherwise, the entire system risks being undermined from within by unskilled, incompetent and criminal individuals placed there by equally uncaring individuals running these fly by night agencies. Perhaps individual states and the staffing industry could work together to develop standards with regards to background checks for employees working in this field.

Bad Cop Makes Chief

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Iron City, Tennessee is finding itself on the lookout for a new police chief after the local Channel 4 news teams investigated the past of Mr. Jesse Barnett who, until this past week, held the esteemed law enforcement position. The investigation uncovered a law enforcement career marred with misconduct spanning several years across two different departments and ending with his current one in Iron City. And the real heartbreak here is that he was hired as Iron City’s Police Chief without a background check during his application and subsequent hiring.

What exactly was the cause of this oversight? Too much paperwork? Not enough funding? Did Jesse Barnett submit forged documents? No, City Manager Jack Meigs simply admitted that he had not conducted a background check prior to hiring Barnett.

That type of simple reasoning might want to be reassessed by the city government given the results of Channel 4’s independent investigation. The findings, which cover Jesse Barnetts two prior position with two different law enforcement agencies, paint a picture less of an individual expected to lead by example and more like a rowdy fraternity member out for a night of beer and brawls.

In 2006, the Perry County Sheriff’s Department terminated Barnett for acts of misconduct while on duty that included confiscating beer and then promptly delivering it to a friend’s party while still on duty. Additionally, a routine traffic stop found him making “inappropriate comments” towards the female driver he pulled over.

Barnett denied the allegations and stated “I’ve never been guilty of any kind of unethical behavior, nor will be in the future.”

Fast forward two years later and Jesse Barnett was hired at the Collinwood Police Department. While most people see a second chance as a way to make amends for wrong doing, others see it as an excuse to fall back on old habits. Take a guess which route was chosen in this case?

During his tenure with the Collinwood Police Department, Jesse Barnett was accused of utilizing an “improper firearm during pursuit of a suspect into the woods. Furthermore, a woman called to complain to a department investigator Barnett had nude photos of her on his cell phone. Sure enough, when the phone was handed over there were indeed photos found. It was enough for the city of Collinwood to make the decision they didn’t want him on their police force anymore.

Chief Daniel Farris shared his thoughts with Channel 4 saying that “I asked him to resign or be fired,” said Farris. “I would not hire him back, and I would not recommend him for any other department.”

And from there? Well, it was on to Iron City. Despite this track record of misconduct and highly questionable behavior that has no place in a law enforcement agency, he was hired on as the Chief of Police. In his seven months as Chief, he developed a poor reputation with the citizenship and when the news of his termination began getting around, residents were more than happy to share their opinions.

Charles Etheredge, resident, said “We all want to get rid of him, most of us,”

“He’s not qualified in my book, and the people in Iron City, the citizens, are not satisfied with him,” according to James Heatherly, another citizen left underwhelmed by the cities choice for it’s governing law officer.

Within a day of the news station’s findings, Jesse Barnett was dismissed by the City Manager for reasons that included hiring four officers without city permission, being involved in three car wrecks in a six month period and making multiple purchases with city funds without proper authorization… including a military grade assault rifle for his own personal use.

Iron City is another example of just how badly hiring oversights can be, especially when the background check process is done half way or disregarded entirely. One can assume that if someone wants to apply for a particular position then obviously they possess all the necessary qualities to excel and maintain the reputation of said position, correct? Unfortunately, there are far too many opportunistic people who take advantage of the authority and power granted to them and that’s why background checks are in place – to catch them. Iron City Management should have known this but let’s hope moving forward the memory of Jesse Barnett has them thinking twice before forgetting about proper hiring procedure.


Texas Child Protective Services Employee Slipped Through “Self-Report Honor System”

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

The Dallas Morning News reported that the State is going to have to take a new look at a “self-reporting” background check policy after it came to light that supervisor in North Texas working for the Department of Child Protective Services (CPS) was found to have a criminal history.

Lauren Taylor was arrested on misdemeanor charges that included a DUI arrest as well as a domestic violence incident, in which she had bludgeoned her husband with a house lamp and then bit him.

Patrick Crimmins, a CPS spokesman, was asked if the agency was concerned at all about this incident and said “Yes we are, obviously. All employees are required to report these incidents – required to. It is not a suggestion.”

The state background check system has come under fire in recent years for having large gaps in which individuals with questionable histories can slip through and begin drawing state paychecks. This latest incident burns the spotlight even hotter on a system that relies in part on a self-report “honor system.”

CPS falls under the departmental umbrella of the Department of Family and Protective Services (DPS). The DPS utilizes a database which has been found by the Dallas Morning News in previous articles to contain a number of security gaps. There have been failures on the part of many counties to report to the DPS final verdicts in many criminal cases, which is a state law requiring they do so.

A recently passed law has given the counties more incentive to communicate these verdicts up the chain of command, but it’s hardly a fix for a system in need of an overhaul. Some see independent background check agencies as a viable means for facilitating background checks between counties and the DPS.

Although not yet policy to utilize background check agencies, Mr. Crimmins did speculate that “It is something that we could look into.” Doing so would require
approaching the legislature and requesting the appropriate funds.

While some might balk at the request for additional funding, what might be preferable? A few hundred thousand for background screening funding or millions in state payouts resulting from lawsuits stemming from negligent hiring practices? You make the call.

Fortunately, some see the reality of the situation, such as Texas Senator Jane Nelson. Ms. Nelson was responsible for passing a bill in a recent legislative session requiring FBI fingerprint checks of individuals working for contractors who provide services to state agencies that are in contact with vulnerable state populations (i.e. the elderly, disabled and young children.)

The Dallas morning news quoted Ms. Nelson as saying “The accuracy and timeliness of criminal background checks have come a long way, but more work is needed. Because resources are limited, it is important that we prioritize our resources on the vetting process with individuals who have the most direct access with our vulnerable population.”

Can people be trusted to come completely clean about their past when it comes to getting a paying job? In a perfect world the answer would be yes, but unfortunately we’re living in one where the truth isn’t always forthcoming. Especially given the current economic climate, many might not willingly come forward with information that will keep them from steady employment and a steady paycheck.

Perhaps in certain situations (And to be honest I really can’t think of many) a self-reporting system might be appropriate, but with the DPS there needs to be a bit more of a substantial and regimented background screening process in place.

Although Lauren Taylor’s position with CPS did not have her in direct contact with children, what if it did? It underscores the importance of utilizing a system that guarantees only qualified individuals are put into contact with segments of the population that find themselves most vulnerable to society’s disagreeable elements. The modern era unfortunately has proven that we can’t always rely on the “honor system” and assume everything will go to plan.

UNIVERSITY OF AKRON RETRACTS DNA BACKGROUND SCREENING POLICY

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

The faculty senate of the University of Akron gathered on Thursday, November 5th to discuss the future of their newly proposed background policy that included a provision requiring submission of one’s DNA as a part of the process.

Following the proceedings, Akron University reached a decision to remove the DNA requirement from the revised background screening policy set to go into effect November 21st. The University of Akron’s media relations specialist Laura Massie explained that the intentions behind the policy were to prepare the institution for the expected direction background screening standards will surely take over the course of the next few decades.

The policy had drawn intense criticism from University faculty members, the local branch of American Association of University Professors and from the ACLU on grounds that it violated the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination act (GINA). In fact, one of the university’s lecturers resigned mid semester in protest.

The DNA testing would have been applied to prospective members of the permanent faculty and administrative support staff, as well as any contracted workers performing work on campus grounds.

Nebraska Prison System to Revamp Background Check Procedure In Wake of Hiring Snafu

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

Nebraska will be re-examining its background check process for hiring personnel at its correctional facilities after an individual from the Czech Republic, sought by Interpol on drug and fraud accusations, was found to be employed at the Tecumseh State Correctional Institution.

Michael Preclik had been working at the prison for a little over a year before the state had discovered his shady background. Enter his name into Google and up comes an Interpol wanted poster from the Czech Republic.

Robert Houston who serves as Director for the Department of Correctional Services said that Google searches might possibly be included as apart of the new background check process being considered for implementation.

It’s smart of Nebraska to want to consider revamping its background check process in light of this embarrassing episode, but may want to utilize more legitimate methods for beefing up protocol. Google may be good at finding just about everything under the sun, but relying on it to verify the qualifications for important state positions may not be the best option.

If Nebraska really wants to get serious about shoring up its background screening process, the state should employ the professional services of a dedicated background screening company. Using Google or social networking for background checks could subject you to legal action should you find misinformation or even missing information about your candidates.

Skipped Background Check Results in “A Bolt Out of the Blue.”

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

The group responsible for hiring Director Doug Loisel to run the show at the Santa Cruz Homeless Services Center is finding itself red in the face after forgoing a criminal background check during the hiring process.

Well, what could criminal background check turn up on him anyway? How about court accusations that he had attempted to serve whiskey to an underage girl and then molested her in Los Angeles in 2008?

Doug Loisel responded to a reporter by saying “I thought I could fly under the radar but I couldn’t.” Although initially stating he would resign immediately, he later recanted and stated that his future plans were “unsure.”

Fellow homeless center board member Rowland Rebele claimed to be unaware of the charges and that this was “a bolt out of the blue.”

Well, when you don’t run a criminal background there can be many bolts coming down on you from above like this one….bolts that can ruin reputations, credibility and put you out of business.

We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again: A criminal background is an essential step in the hiring process. Skip running one at your own risk!

Background Check Helps Free Jaycee Lee Dugard

Thursday, September 3rd, 2009

A background check played a pivotal role in delivering Jaycee Lee Dugard from the clutches of her kidnapper Phillip Garrido.

For those not in the know, Jaycee Lee Dugard was kidnapped at the age of 11 and was presumed dead after having been missing for 18 years. But, thanks to the work of a questioning police officer and a subsequent background check run on Mr. Garrido, the way was paved for Jaycee Dugard to finally escape a long ordeal.

Officer Ally Jacobs met with Mr. Garrido at the request of University of California Berkeley officials following a request by the latter to distribute religious leaflets on the campus on the grounds of “discussing the Lords work.”

During the meeting, Officer Jacobs’ suspicions were aroused by the behavior of not only Phillip Garrido but also that of his two daughters aged 11 and 15 respectively. Suspicious bruises, zombie-like social interaction and blatantly rehearsed answers to questioning were enough to set off red flags for Jacobs.

Even though there wasn’t enough evidence to have the children taken into protective custody, there was enough cause for a background check with Phillip Garrido’s parole officer. The results? It turned out that the convicted rapist never had any daughters in the first place!

Garridos arrest followed a meeting with his parole officer in which Jaycee Dugard was also in attendance. The now young woman revealed she was indeed the 11 year old girl who had disappeared 18 years prior and was presumed dead.

Once again, a simple background check functions as a powerful tool to pull back the camouflage netting of deceit. Had it not been performed by Officer Ally Jacobs, there’s a very strong likelihood Jaycee Dugard would have remained in the paws of Phillip Garrido. Fortunately, that’s not the case and a long, painful ordeal has drawn to a close thanks in part to a police officer that took a closer look where it was certainly deserved.

Reality Show Nightmare

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

The murder of Jasmine Fiore by VH1 reality show star Ryan Jenkins underscores the importance of conducting proper background and criminal history checks in a day and age where it seems nothing can be taken for face value.

It seemed like a perfect union…the gushing materialistic blonde and the tall muscle bound man flush with money. So perfect that no one stopped to thoroughly check the background of a man who had a violent history peppered with assault charges of which his former girlfriends were the most frequent recipients. And it was a history that reached a bright red conclusion with an act of murder.

So were there ANY precautions in place to ensure crazies and weirdos weren’t competing for the time, attention and close physical proximity of an attractive young blonde?

Bozeman Montana Wants Your Passwords

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

If you want to apply for a job working for The City ofBozeman, Montana, be prepared. You’ll have to list your login information and passwords for any social network websites on which you are a member.

The job application includes a standard background check, searching for criminal history, employment & education verifications as well as driving records. It also states:

“Please list any and all, current personal or business websites, web pages or memberships on any internet-based chat rooms, social clubs or forums, to include, but not limited to: Facebook, Google, Yahoo, YouTube.com, MySpace, etc.”

Bozeman City Attorney, Greg Sullivan, was quoted as saying, “…We do those types of investigations to make sure the people that we hire have the highest moral character and are a good fit for the City.”

While employers are encouraged to conduct thorough background checks utilizing social networking sites to screen applicants is normally not advised. Employers can find themselves in legal liability because many sites reveal a job applicant’s race, gender, religion, sexual preference and age – all items that are not legal to take into account during the hiring process.

In Article 2, Section 10 of the Montana Constitution, it says “the right of individual privacy is essential to the well-being of a free society and shall not be infringed without the showing of a compelling state interest.”

Would you apply for a job with Bozeman, Montana or do you think they are limiting their number of applicants because of this issue?